发布于 2015-08-27 16:53:32 | 180 次阅读 | 评论: 0 | 来源: 网络整理
This entry is all about scopes, a somewhat advanced topic related to the 服务容器(Service Container). If you’ve ever gotten an error mentioning “scopes” when creating services, then this entry is for you.
注解
If you are trying to inject the request
service, the simple solution
is to inject the request_stack
service instead and access the current
Request by calling the
getCurrentRequest()
method (see 注入Request). The rest of this entry
talks about scopes in a theoretical and more advanced way. If you’re
dealing with scopes for the request
service, simply inject request_stack
.
The scope of a service controls how long an instance of a service is used by the container. The DependencyInjection component provides two generic scopes:
container
(the default one): The same instance is used each time you
request it from this container.prototype
: A new instance is created each time you request the service.The
ContainerAwareHttpKernel
also defines a third scope: request
. This scope is tied to the request,
meaning a new instance is created for each subrequest and is unavailable
outside the request (for instance in the CLI).
Other than the request
service (which has a simple solution, see the
above note), no services in the default Symfony2 container belong to any
scope other than container
and prototype
. But for the purposes of
this entry, imagine there is another scope client
and a service client_configuration
that belongs to it. This is not a common situation, but the idea is that
you may enter and exit multiple client
scopes during a request, and each
has its own client_configuration
service.
Scopes add a constraint on the dependencies of a service: a service cannot
depend on services from a narrower scope. For example, if you create a generic
my_foo
service, but try to inject the client_configuration
service,
you will receive a
ScopeWideningInjectionException
when compiling the container. Read the sidebar below for more details.
注解
A service can of course depend on a service from a wider scope without any issue.
There are several solutions to the scope problem:
synchronized
(see
A) Using a Synchronized Service);client_configuration
service, this means putting your
new service in the client
scope (see B) Changing the Scope of your Service);container
scope (see
C) Passing the Container as a Dependency of your Service).Each scenario is detailed in the following sections.
2.3 新版功能: Synchronized services were introduced in Symfony 2.3.
Both injecting the container and setting your service to a narrower scope have
drawbacks. Assume first that the client_configuration
service has been
marked as synchronized
:
# app/config/config.yml
services:
client_configuration:
class: AppBundleClientClientConfiguration
scope: client
synchronized: true
synthetic: true
# ...
<!-- app/config/config.xml -->
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<container xmlns="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services
http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services/services-1.0.xsd"
>
<services>
<service
id="client_configuration"
scope="client"
synchronized="true"
synthetic="true"
class="AppBundleClientClientConfiguration"
/>
</services>
</container>
// app/config/config.php
use SymfonyComponentDependencyInjectionDefinition;
$definition = new Definition(
'AppBundleClientClientConfiguration',
array()
);
$definition->setScope('client');
$definition->setSynchronized(true);
$definition->setSynthetic(true);
$container->setDefinition('client_configuration', $definition);
Now, if you inject this service using setter injection, there are no drawbacks and everything works without any special code in your service or in your definition:
// src/AppBundle/Mail/Mailer.php
namespace AppBundleMail;
use AppBundleClientClientConfiguration;
class Mailer
{
protected $clientConfiguration;
public function setClientConfiguration(ClientConfiguration $clientConfiguration = null)
{
$this->clientConfiguration = $clientConfiguration;
}
public function sendEmail()
{
if (null === $this->clientConfiguration) {
// throw an error?
}
// ... do something using the client configuration here
}
}
Whenever the client
scope is active, the service container will
automatically call the setClientConfiguration()
method when the
client_configuration
service is set in the container.
You might have noticed that the setClientConfiguration()
method accepts
null
as a valid value for the client_configuration
argument. That’s
because when leaving the client
scope, the client_configuration
instance
can be null
. Of course, you should take care of this possibility in
your code. This should also be taken into account when declaring your service:
# app/config/services.yml
services:
my_mailer:
class: AppBundleMailMailer
calls:
- [setClientConfiguration, ["@?client_configuration="]]
<!-- app/config/services.xml -->
<services>
<service id="my_mailer"
class="AppBundleMailMailer"
>
<call method="setClientConfiguration">
<argument
type="service"
id="client_configuration"
on-invalid="null"
strict="false"
/>
</call>
</service>
</services>
// app/config/services.php
use SymfonyComponentDependencyInjectionDefinition;
use SymfonyComponentDependencyInjectionContainerInterface;
$definition = $container->setDefinition(
'my_mailer',
new Definition('AppBundleMailMailer')
)
->addMethodCall('setClientConfiguration', array(
new Reference(
'client_configuration',
ContainerInterface::NULL_ON_INVALID_REFERENCE,
false
)
));
Changing the scope of a service should be done in its definition. This example
assumes that the Mailer
class has a __construct
function whose first
argument is the ClientConfiguration
object:
# app/config/services.yml
services:
my_mailer:
class: AppBundleMailMailer
scope: client
arguments: ["@client_configuration"]
<!-- app/config/services.xml -->
<services>
<service id="my_mailer"
class="AppBundleMailMailer"
scope="client">
<argument type="service" id="client_configuration" />
</service>
</services>
// app/config/services.php
use SymfonyComponentDependencyInjectionDefinition;
$definition = $container->setDefinition(
'my_mailer',
new Definition(
'AppBundleMailMailer',
array(new Reference('client_configuration'),
))
)->setScope('client');
Setting the scope to a narrower one is not always possible (for instance, a
twig extension must be in the container
scope as the Twig environment
needs it as a dependency). In these cases, you can pass the entire container
into your service:
// src/AppBundle/Mail/Mailer.php
namespace AppBundleMail;
use SymfonyComponentDependencyInjectionContainerInterface;
class Mailer
{
protected $container;
public function __construct(ContainerInterface $container)
{
$this->container = $container;
}
public function sendEmail()
{
$request = $this->container->get('client_configuration');
// ... do something using the client configuration here
}
}
警告
Take care not to store the client configuration in a property of the object for a future call of the service as it would cause the same issue described in the first section (except that Symfony cannot detect that you are wrong).
The service config for this class would look something like this:
# app/config/services.yml
services:
my_mailer:
class: AppBundleMailMailer
arguments: ["@service_container"]
# scope: container can be omitted as it is the default
<!-- app/config/services.xml -->
<services>
<service id="my_mailer" class="AppBundleMailMailer">
<argument type="service" id="service_container" />
</service>
</services>
// app/config/services.php
use SymfonyComponentDependencyInjectionDefinition;
use SymfonyComponentDependencyInjectionReference;
$container->setDefinition('my_mailer', new Definition(
'AppBundleMailMailer',
array(new Reference('service_container'))
));
注解
Injecting the whole container into a service is generally not a good idea (only inject what you need).